The "Scat Pack" used by Autoblog had 420 hp, which means it's an R/T not a Scat Pack. This mistake leads me to believe both the author and editor are dullards and not to be taken seriously.
autoblog writes some dumb 💩
- Thread starter 8pack-2
- Start date
FWIW (not much) I am pretty sure Autoblog used to be AOL Autos.
I used to LOVE AOL Auto, and Autoblog for looking up previous years of cars, and you could "build" with all the options. They were great when looking for a specific used car and wanted to know what to look for so you didn't get a car and later find out that there was something you could have had in it.
But other than that, I never liked any of their content.
I used to LOVE AOL Auto, and Autoblog for looking up previous years of cars, and you could "build" with all the options. They were great when looking for a specific used car and wanted to know what to look for so you didn't get a car and later find out that there was something you could have had in it.
But other than that, I never liked any of their content.
Pretty sure they only ever say that it's an R/T. Not that it's much better. I kinda wish they had only made this mistake rather than their ridiculous claim...
📢 Support the above vendors that support this site!
To become a Supporting Vendor: ✉️ Message Dragoon
To become a Supporting Vendor: ✉️ Message Dragoon
